Naho Sato vs Gaeul Jang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Aug at 06:12 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Sato vs G. Jang

JPN
2
Win
Played
0
Win

KOR
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sato 2 - 0 Jang
They have played 5 sets in total, with Naho Sato winning 4 and Gaeul Jang winning 1. The last match between Naho Sato and Gaeul Jang was at the W15 Luan, 12-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Naho Sato getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sato | 2 |
| Jang | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Luan(08-12-25)
(QF) W15 Kuala Lumpur(03-08-24)
N. Sato vs G. Jang H2H Profile
N. Sato vs G. Jang Match Preview:
- In recent months, Jang has excelled in second serve points, winning 41.19% compared to Sato's 31.9%. Does this give Jang a significant edge in service games?
- Sato is stronger on return games recently, clinching 56.98% of second serve returns versus Jang's 50.42%. This suggests Sato might have an advantage in breaking Jang's serve.
- When it comes to first serve returns, Jang leads slightly, winning 37.19% of points compared to Sato's 32.25%.
- Under pressure, Sato has demonstrated better breakpoint defense, saving 53.06% of breakpoints, while Jang saves at 46.4%.
- Over the past year, Jang has a better win rate, securing 50% of matches, whereas Sato has won 41.03%.
- Looking at preferred surfaces, Sato thrives on clay with a 69% win rate, while Jang is more successful on hard courts, winning 51% of the time.
- Sato competes more at the Challenger/ITF level with a 38.71% win rate, whereas Jang plays mainly Futures/Satellites, holding a 54.29% success rate.
- In direct head-to-head matches, Sato has defeated Jang in their only encounter, with a 2-1 set victory.
- Deciding set performance favors Sato, with a 54% success rate compared to Jang's 44% over the past twelve months.
- Against stronger opponents on average, Sato faces those ranked around 388.33, whereas Jang's opponents average at 468.96.
- Crucially, Sato converts breakpoints more efficiently, achieving a 68.75% conversion rate against Jang's 44.23%.
Editorial Prediction (August 12, 2025, UTC):
The head-to-head stats indicate that while Sato struggles on second serves, she excels in breaking her opponent's serve, particularly recently. Her higher breakpoint conversion rate is a critical factor supporting her match strategy.
Jang's performance on service games is strong, but her stats show vulnerability on the return where Sato holds an edge. The pressure situations seem to favor Sato, who defends breakpoints and comes out stronger in deciding sets.
Considering direct matchups, especially their previous encounter which Sato won, the analytical outlook leans towards Sato having a slight advantage going into this match. Therefore, based on these facts, Naho Sato is the more likely winner for the upcoming face-off against Jang.
Naho Sato vs Gaeul Jang Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Sato vs G. Jang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 27 | Games Won | 18 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:9:46 | Average Match Time | 2:9:46 |
| 67% (95/142) | 1st Serve % | 59% (101/171) |
| 60% (57/95) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (61/101) |
| 62% (29/47) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (28/70) |
| 37% (10/27) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (5/20) |
| 48% (82/171) | Return Points Win % | 39% (56/142) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Sato Recent Matches Played
G. Jang Recent Matches Played

N. Sato vs G. Jang Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.71% (182/128) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.44% (44/45) |
| 56.85% (394/299) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.00% (103/103) |
| 53.52% (3303/2869) | Games Win/Loss | 50.48% (952/934) |
| 57.63% (136/100) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.57% (44/43) |
| 68.63% (35/16) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (11/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 116 | Aces Total | 144 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 902 | Total Double Faults | 263 |
| 1:31:34 | Average Match Time | 1:35:9 |
| 509.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 426.07 |
| 66% (12043/18214) | 1st Serve % | 58% (3232/5538) |
| 59% (7136/12043) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (1956/3232) |
| 46% (2811/6171) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (996/2306) |
| 53% (1268/2409) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (340/728) |
| 48% (8849/18317) | Return Points Win % | 46% (2628/5653) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 51.98% (118/109) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (15/15) |
| 77.78% (63/18) | Futures W/L | 50.88% (29/28) |
| 58% (178/306) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (43/88) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 56% (27/48) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (4/11) |
| 56% (43/77) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (11/27) |
| 90% (172/155) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (43/35) |
| 10% (172/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (43/8) |
| 20% (138/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (46/8) |