Naho Sato vs Gaeul Jang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L L L L L
Form
W W L W W W W L W LHead-2-Head: Sato 1 - 0 Jang
They have played 3 sets in total, with Sato winning 2 and Jang winning 1. The last match between Sato and Jang was at the W15 Kuala Lumpur, 08-03-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Naho Sato getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Naho Sato | 1 |
| Gaeul Jang | 0 |
W15 Kuala Lumpur(08-03-2024)
6
4
3
6
6
3
| Sato | Stats | Jang |
|---|---|---|
| 33% (4-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (7-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 469 | Ranking | N/A |
| 319 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 24 | Age | 18 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 0 |
| 59% (171-119) | Career Total W/L | 51% (31-30) |
| $2,140 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Dimitrov VS Jarry PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Nishikori VS Shapovalov PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Naho Sato
Player
Gaeul Jang
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
96)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 13 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:44:0 | Average Match Time | 2:44:0 |
| 65% (58/89) | 1st Serve % | 58% (56/96) |
| 59% (34/58) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (34/56) |
| 58% (18/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (18/40) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (4/14) |
| 46% (44/96) | Return Points Win % | 42% (37/89) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Naho Sato Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Natsumi Kawaguchi
Player
Naho Sato
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Haley Giavara
Player
Naho Sato
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thasaporn Naklo
Player
Naho Sato
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandra Krunic
Player
Naho Sato
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-7(4) 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Ekaterina Yashina
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
38%
(
19 of
50)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Pranjala Yadlapalli
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Naho Sato
48%
(
44 of
92)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
46 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Ariana Geerlings
68%
(
76 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
104)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
12
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
48%
(
53 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
104)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasia Tikhonova
Player
Naho Sato
53%
(
61 of
116)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
44%
(
24 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
47%
(
55 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
109
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gaeul Jang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Cherry Kim
Player
Gaeul Jang
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
2
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
4
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
39%
(
17 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
48%
(
53 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
44 of
78)
102
Total Points Won
87
|
6-0 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gaeul Jang
Player
Yingqun Sun
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
16 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
50
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aunchisa Chanta
Player
Gaeul Jang
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gaeul Jang
Player
Eunji Lee
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gaeul Jang
Player
Aruzhan Sagandikova
47%
(
42 of
89)
1st Serve %
47%
(
45 of
95)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
46%
(
41 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
93
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gaeul Jang
Player
Yui Ohwaki
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gaeul Jang
Player
Shihomi Li Xuan Leong
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eunji Lee
Player
Gaeul Jang
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
57 of
83)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gaeul Jang
Player
Romane Longueville
48%
(
27 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gaeul Jang
Player
Honori Koyama
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (171/119) | Win/Loss | 51% (31/30) |
| 57% (370/278) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (74/71) |
| 54% (3105/2685) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (683/651) |
| 58% (125/91) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (31/28) |
| 69% (35/16) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (11/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 106 | Aces Total | 104 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 807 | Total Double Faults | 213 |
| 1:30:34 | Average Match Time | 1:37:47 |
| 482.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 427.75 |
| 66% (11231/16943) | 1st Serve % | 58% (2229/3856) |
| 59% (6660/11231) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (1354/2229) |
| 46% (2621/5712) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (694/1627) |
| 53% (1176/2239) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (239/529) |
| 48% (8223/17052) | Return Points Win % | 47% (1878/4002) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (112/103) | Challenger W/L | 53% (8/7) |
| 79% (58/15) | Futures W/L | 51% (23/22) |
| 58% (167/286) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (30/60) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 60% (26/43) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 40% (4/10) |
| 56% (40/72) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (9/22) |
| 90% (163/147) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 77% (30/23) |
| 10% (163/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 23% (30/7) |
| 19% (127/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (31/7) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
